Quantcast
Channel: Jake formerly of the LP
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 125

Yes GOPs, JFK cut taxes. Let's go back to those 1960s rates, shall we?

$
0
0

On his 100th birthday, I want to give a little context to a certain claim that is sometimes floated regarding John F. Kennedy. Right-wingers will often try to justify tax cuts by saying something like "Even JFK cut taxes and they worked! Why have liberals lost their way?"

The first sentence is true- John F. Kennedy indeed did ask for a tax cut, which was working its way through Congress when Kennedy was shot in November 1963, and was signed into law 3 months later as the Revenue Act of 1964. This lowered tax rates across the board for both individuals and corporations, and established a minimum standard deduction which reduced taxes further for many people. And from 1964-1966, the US economy boomed, with GDP growth consistently being between 6-10%. Unemployment also fell from 5.2% to 3.5% from 1964 to 1969 (a bunch of Boomers entering the work force and a major ramping up of spending in Vietnam and the Great Society didn't hurt, either).

By 1965, when Kennedy's proposed tax cut was fully phased in, there were 25 (!) federal tax brackets, with the rates sliding higher with income. Here are some of the key cutoff points (using this handy site from the Tax Foundation), and I'll adjust for inflation and use 2017 dollars, so you can have an idea about how this would translate into the modern day.

Tax brackets for selected income levels, married filing jointly 1965 (adj for inflation) 14% $0-$7,651 19% $30,602-$61,205 22% $61,205-$91,806 25% $91,806-$122,409 28% $122,409-$153,012 32% $153,012-$183,614 36% $200,000 42% $250,000 48% $300,000 50% $340,000 53% $400,000 55% $500,000 60% $675,000 64% $1,000,000 68% $1,225,000 70% $1,530,721+

Other differences between then and now include the capital gains tax rate being a flat 25% in 1965, the same as the post-Obamacare 25% that the rich pay for long-term cap gains and above the 15% rate on dividends that we have today. The top corporate rate in 1965 was 48%, which is a lot more than the 35% top rate (that no regular corporation pays) that Paul Ryan and company whine about in 2017.

And oh yeah, what was the federal minimum wage in 1965? The equivalent of $9.70 an hour when you adjust for inflation. Yes, I think it should be more than that today, but I’ll settle for $9.70 as a starting point.

So if Republicans want to pay tribute to JFK and bring back the same tax brackets as we had under his early '60s "tax cut", count me in! It'd definitely work better than the oligarchical, pro-rich, pro-corporate crap we have today.

Remember when we believed in this?

And today's Republicans seem to forget this statement of JFK's, which helps to explain his spending philosophy, and how the nation must invest and lead, and put our money where our mouth is.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 125

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>